[169566] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ISP inbound failover without BGP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Tue Mar 4 00:17:26 2014
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 21:14:29 -0800
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <1473335835.293638.1393903242317.JavaMail.zimbra@network1.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 3/3/14, 7:20 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> Is there some technical reason that BGP is not an option? You could allow them to announce their AT&T space via you as a secondary.
With the risk of starting holy war on how BGP works on dialup and that
providers should permit such, the OP has not specified what transport
methods is in play with AT&T which could limit such an option.
~Seth
