[169402] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lukasz Bromirski)
Sun Feb 23 12:50:24 2014
From: Lukasz Bromirski <lukasz@bromirski.net>
In-Reply-To: <20140223.182945.74711117.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:50:49 +0100
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 23 Feb 2014, at 18:29, sthaug@nethelp.no wrote:
> Speaking only for myself: No. The L2 IXes I connect to should use =
their
> resources for packet switching, not filtering. Way too many things =
that
> could go wrong if we go down the filtering path=E2=80=A6
Indeed. Most of the L2 IXes run on very =E2=80=9Ccost-optimized=E2=80=9D =
solutions
just to switch as fast as they can without going in details of what
actually is being switched - at least in Europe.=20
To do some additional checks would require extensive testing, platforms
capable of doing this in predictable manner (stability, performance)
and obviously - a lot more work than it costs today.
--=20
"There's no sense in being precise when | =C5=81ukasz =
Bromirski
you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromirski@jabber.org
about." John von Neumann | http://lukasz.bromirski.net