[169390] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Filter NTP traffic by packet size?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Sat Feb 22 11:04:45 2014
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 08:04:10 -0800
From: Paul Ferguson <fergdawgster@mykolab.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <5308BCF8.9060801@foobar.org>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org list" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: fergdawgster@mykolab.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2/22/2014 7:06 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 22/02/2014 09:07, Cb B wrote:
>> Summary IETF response: The problem i described is already solved
>> by bcp38, nothing to see here, carry on with UDP
>
> udp is here to stay. Denying this is no more useful than trying to
> push the tide back with a teaspoon.
>
Yes, udp is here to stay, and I quote Randy Bush on this, "I encourage
my competitors to block udp." :-p
- - ferg
- --
Paul Ferguson
VP Threat Intelligence, IID
PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlMIynoACgkQKJasdVTchbJsqQD/ZVz5vYaIAEv/z2kbU6kEM+KS
OQx2XcSkU7r02wNDytoBANVkgZQalF40vhQED+6KyKv7xL1VfxQg1W8T4drh+6/M
=FTxg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
