[169330] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: question about AS relationship
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Song Li)
Fri Feb 21 00:38:22 2014
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:37:52 +0800
From: Song Li <refresh.lsong@gmail.com>
To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <201402210342.47859.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Reply-To: refresh.lsong@gmail.com
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Thanks. In order to prevent route leaking, this imformation should be
provided to providers.
but another question, should the AS relationships between customer and
its other neighbors (downstrem/peer/another provider) be private?
--
Sky Li
> On Thursday, February 20, 2014 08:09:35 PM Christopher
> Morrow wrote:
>
>> so, yes. pleass tell your upstream your customers so
>> proper filtering can be automated and implemented.
>>
>> don't turn up bgp customers without filtering, that kills
>> kittens.
> For all the leaking I've seen in the last four weeks
> (including a well-known operator that was involved in the
> Youtube/Pakistan saga + other well-known global operators
> that could be classified as "a reasonably large tier"),
> we're still a long way away ensuring all customer prefixes
> are filtered correctly at the inter-domain peering edge. A
> loooooooong way away...
>
> Mark.
