[169230] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: spamassassin

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Wed Feb 19 01:21:03 2014

Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:20:37 +0800
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Private Sender <nobody@snovc.com>
In-Reply-To: <53042CB6.60304@snovc.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

as i said, much of the crap coming through, 10-20 times normal, does not
have dkim.  i suggest that focusing on dkim is a red herring.  and yes,
i know how dkim works.

> If that is the case, there must be someway to configure to reject if the
> dkim signature is invalid.

5.0-0.8 is a large valus, at least in this area.

> You could always block their ip in the ...

their?  you are presuming a single soure.

> You could also add a rbl query to your mail server config to spamhaus.

have had that for years

randy


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post