[169201] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: spamassassin
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Thomas)
Tue Feb 18 22:05:04 2014
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 19:04:26 -0800
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <m2zjlnrhqe.wl%randy@psg.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 02/18/2014 05:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> in the last 3-4 days, a *massive* amount of spam is making it past
> spamassassin to my users and to me. see appended for example. not
> all has dkim.
>
>
It's been a while since i've been in this world, but I wonder whether
bayes filters are
using the public key of the dkim selector as a token. if they don't
change selectors/keys
they'd probably be s-canned pretty quickly. It would require that the
dkim subsystem
talk to the bayes subsystem since the public key isn't in the signature,
so i'm guessing
not.
Mike