[169190] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: HP to Cisco fiber

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jared Mauch)
Tue Feb 18 15:48:52 2014

From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <489EAE655F69A246A2CBF4197BFD2511E13775A7@exchange.corp.fpu-tn.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 15:48:22 -0500
To: Eric J Esslinger <eesslinger@fpu-tn.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On Feb 18, 2014, at 2:44 PM, Eric J Esslinger <eesslinger@fpu-tn.com> =
wrote:

> I've talked to HP and Cisco and neither side will commit to any kind =
of answer to this question, so I thought I'd ask it here:
> Does anyone know if a Cisco switch equipped with a 1000BASE-BX10-D SFP =
will connect to an HP switch equipped with a HP X122 1G SFP LC BX-U =
Transceiver J9143B SFP, assuming they are already talking over dual =
fiber links and both units support the single fiber sfp's? (they do).
>=20
> All the specs look like they should but Cisco and HP are doing the old =
'will neither confirm nor deny interoperability'.
>=20
> Off list reply is fine, I'd like someone with a definite 'yes I did it =
and it works fine' or 'no I tried it and it did not', not 'it should' =
because that's where I'm at for the moment.

Sounds like it should based on your description.  You should make sure =
other media settings match, such as speed, etc.. While this may seem =
illogical on a 1G SFP, some devices have varying expectations of that, =
so sometimes "speed nonegotiate" is necessary.

If you are going from HP-HP to Cisco-HP, you may need to disable their =
transciever eeprom check on the Cisco side.

- Jared=


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post