[169183] in North American Network Operators' Group
=?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_=22Everyone_should_be_deploying_?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Larry Sheldon)
Tue Feb 18 14:11:43 2014
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:11:03 -0600
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <TtLv1n02D1Una3W01tM1pP>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/18/2014 11:20 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> Here's a piece which uses the MIT ANA data to assert that the job is
> mostly done already.
>
> Unless I'm very much mistaken, it appears that a large percentage of
> the failed BCP 38 spoofing tests listed in that data are actually due
> to customer side NAT routers dropping packets...
>
> which is of course egress filtering rather than ingress filtering,
> and thus doesn't actually apply to our questions.
>
> Am I interpreting that correctly?
The date seems a little past "buy by" in light of the very recent
observations and comments here.
> http://www.senki.org/everyone-should-be-deploying-bcp-38-wait-they-are/
--
Requiescas in pace o email Two identifying characteristics
of System Administrators:
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Infallibility, and the ability to
learn from their mistakes.
(Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
