[169079] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_L=F6winger?=)
Tue Feb 11 19:33:20 2014
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:32:43 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Anders_L=F6winger?= <anders@abundo.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402112340290.24915@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2014-02-11 23:41, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>> Is there not an issue with this if the customer is connected directly to the
>> access device over L2? They will not communicate with each other direcly,
>> all traffic will be exchanged through the default gateway?
>
> Yes, what's the problem with that?
Bad description by me. I'll try again.
If I have two PCs in my home, connected with GE to a L2 switch and I buy 10
Mbit Internet access, I don't want traffic between my two PCs to be exchanged
through the default route.
They could possible communicate directly using link-local, but I'm not sure
how they would find each other?
Default gw could send a redirect...
> I'd venture to say that any IPv6 implementation that doesn't support this is
> broken and should be fixed by the implementor.
Agree.
/Anders
