[169063] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geraint Jones)
Tue Feb 11 02:10:57 2014
From: Geraint Jones <geraint@koding.com>
In-Reply-To: <52F9905C.2020505@alvarezp.ods.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 20:10:23 +1300
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Or assuming your using an Ethernet of some sort as your upstream connections=
you could grab something like a CCR from mikrotik for < $1k and sleep easy k=
nowing you're only using 6% of it's capacity.
Sent from my iPhone =EF=A3=BF
> On 11/02/2014, at 3:52 pm, Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org> wro=
te:
>=20
>> On 02/10/2014 06:05 PM, Vlade Ristevski wrote:
>> Are you suggesting getting the default gateway from both providers or
>> getting the full table from one and using the default as a backup on the
>> other (7206)?
>=20
> Whatever suits you best. Test and see. I'd just receive the full table
> anyway but filter them out, letting only the default routes go into the
> RIB. This should streamline your FIB. As I say, you lose outbound load
> balancing and your redundancy becomes all-or-nothing, but you save a few
> cycles.
>=20
> Again, I wouldn't recommend any of this because of the drawbacks, but
> along with other recommendations that others have made, like Turbo ACLs,
> it may buy you some time.
>=20
