[169055] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Mon Feb 10 15:53:09 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:38:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <52F91338.104@foobar.org>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart16776461.sDbuLUYeip
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Monday, February 10, 2014 07:58:16 PM Nick Hilliard=20
wrote:
> in fact, the npe-g1 uses a BCM1250 which is a dual CPU
> unit but vanilla IOS is not able to use the second CPU
> for packet forwarding. Unsubstantiated rumour claimed
> that modular IOS (QNX kernel) could push about 1.6x the
> throughput of vanilla IOS, as it was smp capable. Pity
> it was never released.
Haha, you remind me of PXF (although that was the NSE-100=20
and NSE-150).
Mark.
--nextPart16776461.sDbuLUYeip
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=xINe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart16776461.sDbuLUYeip--
