[169049] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 7206 VXR NPE-G1 throughput
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Mon Feb 10 15:32:04 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 22:31:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: <52F8ED75.2090200@ramapo.edu>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart21096479.RMmqxSO06K
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Monday, February 10, 2014 05:17:09 PM Vlade Ristevski=20
wrote:
> This is the interface that connects to our provider. As
> you can see its almost all download traffic. Our ASR1002
> handles it without a sweat but I'm a little skeptical of
> whether the 7206 will hold up.
An NPE-G2 has a better chance of handling 600Mbps.
Mark.
--nextPart21096479.RMmqxSO06K
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=SbSt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart21096479.RMmqxSO06K--
