[168991] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sat Feb 8 01:56:22 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 08:55:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402080536300.24915@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart3083894.ip5HuXpT2S
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Saturday, February 08, 2014 06:38:29 AM Mikael=20
Abrahamsson wrote:
> That's one way of doing it, or you give it an IA_NA as
> well if you want a WAN address.
We prefer DHCP_IA_NA to ND/RA.
But yes, either option works. Just depends on operator=20
choice as well as BNG and CPE support.
Mark.
--nextPart3083894.ip5HuXpT2S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=1SY2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart3083894.ip5HuXpT2S--
