[168947] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Feb 7 03:18:39 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 10:18:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1402070811020.24915@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart33141765.f6vC6LXb6W
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Friday, February 07, 2014 09:11:38 AM Mikael Abrahamsson=20
wrote:
> Violent agreement. Customers should not talk L2 directly
> to each other using local switching, but they should be
> able to send IP packets to each other.
And in fairness, given the positive security benefits=20
(barring extreme corner cases or hardware/software bugs),=20
the otherwise sub-optimal tromboning between homes via the=20
BNG is an acceptable compromise.
Mark.
--nextPart33141765.f6vC6LXb6W
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=eFbk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart33141765.f6vC6LXb6W--
