[168943] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: SIP on FTTH systems

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Fri Feb 7 00:59:51 2014

Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 00:59:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
To: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <00b301cf23c1$7c694dd0$753be970$@iname.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frank Bulk" <frnkblk@iname.com>

> And then you need MACFF to overcome the split-horizon to that
> customers in the same subnet can talk to each other. =)

In my not-at-all humble opinion, in an eyeball network, you almost *never*
want to make it easier for houses to talk to one another directly; there
isn't any "real" traffic there.  Just attack traffic.

Well, ok; slim chance of P2P, but carriers hate that anyway, right? :-)

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       jra@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates       http://www.bcp38.info          2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA      BCP38: Ask For It By Name!           +1 727 647 1274


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post