[168876] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: SIP on FTTH systems
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Thu Feb 6 05:58:01 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: "cdel.firsthand.net" <cdel@firsthand.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:57:20 +0200
In-Reply-To: <27852B69-BB16-4266-917D-5F3E5388B5CD@firsthand.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart1474168.tbPzYyYrop
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:56:45 AM=20
cdel.firsthand.net wrote:
> Time for users to consider splitting L2 services from IP
> ?
But consumer broadband is all about IP; the Layer 2 is=20
needed to transport that IP, and that's a network problem,=20
not a user one.
Mark.
--nextPart1474168.tbPzYyYrop
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=tVJ0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1474168.tbPzYyYrop--
