[168865] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jay Ashworth)
Wed Feb 5 23:42:56 2014
In-Reply-To: <201402060638.08567.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
From: Jay Ashworth <jra@baylink.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 23:39:56 -0500
To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu,Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm going to be somewhat of a pain in everybody's ass this year, pounding on the drum whenever the topic pops up. :-)
On February 5, 2014 11:38:08 PM EST, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>On Thursday, February 06, 2014 06:34:16 AM Jay Ashworth
>wrote:
>
>> Sure. Part of the data collection task. Making sure all
>> the current new gear knows how, still a good idea.
>
>Yep - like Joel said; current kit supports it (well, the
>ones I buy, anyway), and certainly a good idea for operators
>to make sure their favorite vendor can support this when
>they run their next purchase cycle.
>
>Mark.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
