[168799] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 [Was: Re: TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Livingood, Jason)
Tue Feb 4 19:58:48 2014
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: Octavio Alvarez <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org>, "North American Network
Operators' Group" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 00:53:17 +0000
In-Reply-To: <52F18A5E.8050803@alvarezp.ods.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2/4/14, 7:48 PM, "Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp@alvarezp.ods.org> wrote:
>What I'm failing to understand, and again, please excuse me if I'm
>oversimplifying, is what data do you need from researchers,
>specifically. What specific actionable data would be helpful? Why does
>the lack of the data prevent you from applying an ACL.
What I am suggesting is that the community at large needs measurement
data, rather than individual network operators (which already know if they
do or do not implement BCP38). Only with a long list of operators that DO
prevent spoofing and a list of those that DO NOT, backed up with a decent
data set (enough measurement points, enough measurement tests, across
enough time, with an openly shared methodology), can the community start
to encourage non-adopters to change their position. Just my two cents
though...
Jason
