[168779] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BCP38 is hard, was TWC (AS11351) blocking all NTP?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Chuck Anderson)
Tue Feb 4 17:36:39 2014
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:36:18 -0500
From: Chuck Anderson <cra@WPI.EDU>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20140204221821.57348.qmail@joyce.lan>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:18:21PM -0000, John Levine wrote:
> I was at a conference with people from some Very Large ISPs. They
> told me that many of their large customers absolutely will not let
> them do BCP38 filtering. ("If you don't want our business, we can
> find someone else who does.") The usual problem is that they have PA
> space from two providers and for various reasons, not all of which are
> stupid, traffic with provider A's addresses sometimes goes out through
> provider B. Adding to the excitement, some of these customers are
> medium sized ISPs with multihomed customers of their own.
>
> I don't know BGP well enough to know if it's possible to send out
> announcements for this situtation, this address range is us, but don't
> route traffic to it. Even if it is, not all of the customers do BGP,
> some are just stub networks.
>
> If we could figure out a reasonable way (i.e., one that the customers
> might be willing to implement) to handle this, it'll make BCP38 a lot
> more doable.
No-Advertise or No-Export community?
