[168486] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Will a single /27 get fully routed these days?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sander Steffann)
Mon Jan 27 04:10:03 2014
In-Reply-To: <7D4E381D-CEC8-40A1-A28E-9EB41F88AB8B@delong.com>
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:09:32 +0100
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>=20
>>>> But more important: which /10 is set aside for this? It is not listed o=
n https://www.arin.net/knowledge/ip_blocks.html
>>>=20
>>> I'm not sure it has been determined yet, let alone announced.
>>=20
>> According to https://www.arin.net/resources/request/ipv4_countdown.html p=
hase one it should have been done in September 2012: 'IPv4 address space req=
uired for NRPM 4.10, which sets aside a contiguous IPv4 /10 block to facilit=
ate IPv6 deployment, was reserved and removed from the remaining IPv4 addres=
s pool.' I can't find anything more specific though...
>=20
> OK, then I'm sure it's been determined, but I can't really fault them for n=
ot announcing it yet.
?!?!? How are people supposed to prepare their filters for those tiny alloc=
ations if the corresponding prefix is not published?
This is not making any sense...
Sander
