[16844] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Wired Q: Embedded NT
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael Nelson)
Thu May 14 16:32:52 1998
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 14:45:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Nelson <mikenel@wam.umd.edu>
To: James Glave <james@wired.com>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199805132219.PAA09202@wired.com>
FWIW, Berkeley Networks is an example of a company who has already done
this -- http://www.berkeleynet.com.
On Wed, 13 May 1998, James Glave wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> James Glave at Wired News again. This time around I am seeking opinions on
> behalf of a friend up at Wired (the print magazine) -- concerning embedded
> NT. I couldn't find any discussion in the nanog archive, so I'm wondering
> if anoyne here has any experience with, or knowledge of, embedding NT in
> networking hardware - if that even makes any sense....?
>
> >From: Jesse Freund <freund@wired.com>
> >i'm working on a piece about nt-embedded and i have a couple of questions.
> >i'm hoping you might be able to hook me up with a smart network operator or
> >someone else in the know or perhaps you know. basically, i'm curious why
> >the hell someone would want a version of nt embedded in a switch or router?
> >and who provides the custom solutions nt-embedded is meant to replace?
>
> Thanks, all!
>
> jtg
>
> James Glave, Senior Technology Writer
> Wired News http://www.wired.com (415) 276-8430
>
> Unstoppable Force of the Week: "Gettin' jiggy wit' it!"
>
