[168435] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Sat Jan 25 12:12:44 2014

From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 19:12:10 +0200
In-Reply-To: <81568F67-1A4A-4E2D-80A3-6CDA6BA0BBF6@delong.com>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

--nextPart2061773.CutoXjhClM
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday, January 24, 2014 10:59:19 PM Owen DeLong wrote:

> I wasn=E2=80=99t attempting to promote or discourage use of MPLS.
> I was merely endeavoring to point out that in an MPLS
> world, OSPF costs are not how you want to manage your
> traffic.

Again, only an issue when using RSVP-TE.

I'd recommend MPLS-TE (especially core-to-core, as that is=20
more scalable) when looking at making more aggregate routing=20
decisions when dealing with a bandwidth vs. latency=20
conundrum.

Adjusting IGP costs in favour of latency works well, but can=20
have pile-on effects behind or in front of the links being=20
worked on, which can be confusing to troubleshoot when=20
taking other PoP-specific factors into account. It also=20
obliterates any sane cost-assignment mechanism you might=20
have developed (or at best, makes it overly complex).

There is room for both options, typically depending on=20
network size, number of links, rate of topology change in=20
your network and skill level of your network engineering=20
team.

Mark.

--nextPart2061773.CutoXjhClM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAABAgAGBQJS4/BqAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GQ3kQALUkbGySxpRwejZzQqyTYjL/
rzzJ9uU9D1LbrwqCXHzP+wv9y5UwY1QBVy6HoCC+PolSsnnMckA+ZtKhUtESP+fG
cDX+X8vKwDJ6Y1EsTBMOh+TdPCX7D4lxSXNyBPq+P0LatnUQnoj3dKyJolUlptnb
erR8u480JX03rBeft1hdx0kiOh/j4Scy7KkkDk1LYOp8NvSNETnNCkdUIP5xkU8F
Y6Fd9rLgRgSnvTIwvU+4XaB6olaJlKctguY2Ojq2NFeZmc2wQLxewnGpaOtKQs9C
7af1aWXttzwwLZt3it02fSGryBRTwO8YE2Aby1NRMvZ9Lz+RBywl74e4HisDYX7W
ygY7dV5+yzY/Ht2i4u4M+RZHlogXmgxPzxI350ruxs32Qi0GpG86eSoLCVNvwcpA
qByJ+Ln+c5+V20c0pBzodToQXeSmV3BSeRkFHnsvd0EPMe2KvKSKWIFtOj3Fj457
2RCVGZU3YYT4IapEM8mbX58FPGDcSmA+WwKExHUh2BTngdmPHd6htUoTt/TwQUvM
vIqZmoLwXMyO4SoUfkqlAg/QaRyO1+L5YHdrmyNRogF0lM2l5RXgEpe327NKBWHf
kkBBvduHXEa1ytcgWVruSBj63Z947hQcvNIr5nRAVlsHStvT21lNXvGE2HGbnJEW
e/PBDSimH4dD/MppZPhk
=oWzi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2061773.CutoXjhClM--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post