[16841] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 1.1.1.0/24
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Todd R. Stroup)
Thu May 14 16:09:45 1998
Date: Thu, 14 May 1998 09:50:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Todd R. Stroup" <tstroup@fnsi.net>
To: Sean Donelan <SEAN@SDG.DRA.COM>
cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <980513170738.8d21@SDG.DRA.COM>
So what are you saying here Sean? We don't have a clue? 3/4 of the
Internet service providers must not have a clue then. I don't belive I
have ever read anywhere that 1/8 or anything smaller wasn't a valid
route.
Maybe you would like to show what you have in your BGP tables for 12/8?
How about 9/8?
How about 24/8?
How about 32/8?
How about 44/8?
Do you want me to go on??
T..S
On Wed, 13 May 1998, Sean Donelan wrote:
> >Looks like PSInet is demonstrating their complete and total lack of clue
> >again.
>
> Who has less of a clue? A provider that announces a 1.1.1.0/24, or
> a provider that listens to junk like 1.1.1.0/24?
>
> It doesn't matter what junk is announced, *IF* you could get providers
> not to listen to it.
> --
> Sean Donelan, Data Research Associates, Inc, St. Louis, MO
> Affiliation given for identification not representation
>
