[168399] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: OSPF Costs Formula that include delay.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Raymond Burkholder)
Fri Jan 24 15:51:38 2014
X-OneUnified-MailScanner-From: ray@oneunified.net
From: "Raymond Burkholder" <ray@oneunified.net>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <7C20A721-0F11-4368-ADA4-11E512C06777@delong.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:41:15 -0400
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>
> Some networks I have worked with took the average latency of each link and
> assigned that (with some constant multiple) as the interface cost.
>
> Of course this all fails miserably if you are using anything like MPLS
> underneath your OSPF.
>
But then when using MPLS underneath, then MPLS Traffic Engineering can be
used to do some interesting path computations and resiliency configurations.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
