[168381] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: About ddos-response@nfoservers.com
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tei)
Fri Jan 24 10:40:34 2014
In-Reply-To: <81CDF960-7192-4B39-8226-075A052D0B67@gizmopartners.com>
From: Tei <oscar.vives@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 16:40:02 +0100
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 24 January 2014 16:23, Chris Boyd <cboyd@gizmopartners.com> wrote:
>
> On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>> You haven=E2=80=99t been able to get GTT/nLayer/TINet to track the traff=
ic back?
>>
>> Details are welcome, either here or in private. There are plenty of peo=
ple who will chase and fix this stuff when they=E2=80=99re aware of it.
>
> When OpenResolver Project was announced, there were about 60 abusable add=
resses in my corner of the Internet. I was able to get that number down un=
der 20 by asking politely. The NFOserver reports have been a pretty good s=
tick to get the number down below 10.
>
http://dns.measurement-factory.com/surveys/openresolvers/ASN-reports/latest=
.html
Uh.. Oh. I see a lot of references to Tel=C3=A9fonica in Latin America.
--=20
--
=E2=84=B1in del =E2=84=B3ensaje.
