[168256] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Proxy ARP detection
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Warren Bailey)
Thu Jan 16 12:17:57 2014
From: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
To: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:17:39 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20140116165107.GI67472@burnout.tpb.net>
Reply-To: Warren Bailey <wbailey@satelliteintelligencegroup.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I seem to recall some video encoders doing that, but I can't remember the v=
endor.
Sent from my Mobile Device.
-------- Original message --------
From: Niels Bakker <niels=3Dnanog@bakker.net>
Date: 01/16/2014 8:54 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Proxy ARP detection
* vristevs@ramapo.edu (Vlade Ristevski) [Thu 16 Jan 2014, 17:46 CET]:
>Cisco ASA's still have proxy ARP enabled by default when certain NAT
>types are configured.
That wasn't the question. The question was what equipment would send
proxy ARP replies as broadcasts, possibly causing poisoning in other
routers (which still sounds far-fetched to me).
-- Niels.
--
"It's amazing what people will do to get their name on the internet,
which is odd, because all you really need is a Blogspot account."
-- roy edroso, alicublog.blogspot.com
