[168192] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: best practice for advertising peering fabric routes
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Wed Jan 15 07:55:58 2014
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
To: nanog@nanog.org,
mh@xalto.net
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:55:15 +0200
In-Reply-To: <52D63F6C.7010907@free.fr>
Reply-To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--nextPart7095337.OH1cAksQQH
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 09:57:32 AM Michael Hallgren=20
wrote:
> I don't think you need route-reflection in a 5 node iBGP.
I'm for doing it now and not worrying about it later.
Also, don't originate your routes from your peering router=20
Mark.
--nextPart7095337.OH1cAksQQH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)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=LELm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart7095337.OH1cAksQQH--
