[168101] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Verizon FIOS IPv6?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Wed Jan 8 21:42:37 2014
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <FCD26398C5EDE746BFC47F43EA52A17305A15E9D@dino.ad.hostasaurus.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 18:42:00 -0800
To: David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Jan 8, 2014, at 18:27 , David Hubbard <dhubbard@dino.hostasaurus.com> =
wrote:
> HE will give you five /64's and you can also get a /48 if you need =
more
> for one end point. The service works flawlessly; much more than can =
be
> said for VZW. I run it from DD-WRT-based router at home and have
> several office locations using it via Cisco gear. Would still greatly
> prefer native though to avoid the messier setup, throughput (although =
HE
> is very good on that front too), latency, etc.
To clarify, you get 2 /64s per tunnel... One for the tunnel itself and =
one for your site.
You can also get an additional /48 per tunnel just by requesting it.
Owen
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul B. Henson [mailto:henson@acm.org]=20
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 8:29 PM
> To: 'Ian Bowers'
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: Verizon FIOS IPv6?
>=20
> I don't remember where I saw it, I believe it was on an official =
Verizon
> page, but it said something about giving out /56's to their business
> static IP customers, guess they want to be sure not to run out ;). HE =
I
> believe gives out /64's?
>=20
> The cynic in me believes they are intentionally delaying it to prop up
> their ridiculously high margins on IPv4 static addresses. Right now =
I'm
> paying $20/month extra for an additional four for a total of five on =
my
> account.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
