[168043] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon Jan 6 16:53:32 2014
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:53:14 -1000
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Nitzan Tzelniker <nitzan.tzelniker@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFeb_vcgtUOxJHZnxYqFzUSYxZ2=pf7ECn_8eFpNep_YBJCopA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Jan__6_11:53:10_2014-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> A little bit overkill in term of number of ports but you can consider
> the new Trident 2 switches Juniper EX-5100, Cisco Nexus 3100 .....
> They have unified TCAM that can store 128K v4 routes
the nice thing about buying bgp devices that can not hold a full table
is that you can expense them in the year of purchase as opposed to
amortizing them over 5 years or so.
randy
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Jan__6_11:53:10_2014-1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAABCgAGBQJSyyXKAAoJEMzMBey4OgLtnrQH/0IysXcn9kRaxIv/L/IntLeN
hcqMcn5QNjDG7BcifAac94lzJG2JWM45efJ13YdCxqouITAcOMpcodWswnFmE+wd
yFhq+Ydzop4t2gCENvHzBHA/yaYjjjECPOyRqSdYEPYpxJFLw73gbpkHAeVUiH2o
dXGNqEMlBG3R/N1BxxUCcN2vJ5NcV+pXq8BbXQj2Er29/4Dts4VJJhLpQgcHYULM
fMV7QfxL0zUcjmpN8wpM/pQjO6dAt29oOWKCEySuCZx9lMZcCo+i3caGUXS3AkVG
pUBc4Vb5sstPFAGbAp8LPvZNPJIfpgm3JenNwTYUJdmTa6NSo+hY/VwTlbH8Wr4=
=7KYm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pgp-sign-Multipart_Mon_Jan__6_11:53:10_2014-1--
