[168034] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IXP + government transparency report
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Martin Hannigan)
Mon Jan 6 15:22:10 2014
In-Reply-To: <C3FE35CD-DE73-400A-91DA-39426EE40511@pch.net>
From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 15:21:13 -0500
To: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Cc: nanog <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> wrote:
>
> On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:52 AM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > As well as being first to be open-ix certified, I think LINX hit a seco=
nd
> > first that is as interesting;
> >
> >
> >
> https://www.linx.net/service/publicpeering/novafiles/nova-usgov-reports.h=
tml
>
> =85and is this function being conducted completely without dependencies
> inside the U.S.?
>
Bill,
OIX certified organizations must provide an accurate and monthly report on
Government Information Requests and actions taken related to the requests.
You can see an example here http://xmission.com/transparency
With regards to Patriot 215 and FISA 701, there are recommendations for
warrant canaries. Obviously, much trickier.
I think the point is about leadership and taking small, but giant, steps. I
hope that everyone in the infrastructure follows this lead and does exactly
the same thing.
Best,
-M<
