[167996] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: turning on comcast v6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Raymond Burkholder)
Fri Jan 3 22:52:02 2014
X-OneUnified-MailScanner-From: ray@oneunified.net
From: "Raymond Burkholder" <ray@oneunified.net>
To: "'NANOG'" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <52C77179.8040803@mykolab.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 23:48:16 -0400
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> >> There is simply no good reason not to include default route in the
> configuration for DHCPv6, and it's long overdue.
> >
> > As I've said before, if we're going to bother doing it, we should just
include
> RIO options, but otherwise, I agree with you.
> >
Are DHCPv6 and/or NDP extendible for other stuff? For example, in IPv4,
Cisco uses DHCP option 150 for advertising Callmanager addresses in their IP
Telephony networks. I've been out of the Cisco IPT side of stuff for
awhile, but wondered how that has been tackled. And I think things like NTP
addresses have been delivered in DHCP packets.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
