[167946] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eugeniu Patrascu)
Wed Jan 1 16:51:38 2014

In-Reply-To: <20140101095537.GA21572@pob.ytti.fi>
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 23:51:15 +0200
From: Eugeniu Patrascu <eugen@imacandi.net>
To: Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Saku Ytti <saku@ytti.fi> wrote:

> On (2013-12-31 23:04 +0000), Warren Bailey wrote:
>
> > that RSA had a check cut for their participation (sell outs..), would i=
t
> > be out of the realm of possibility cisco knowingly placed this into the=
ir
> > product line? And would it be their mistake to come out with a =93we ha=
d no
> > idea!=94 rather than =93guys with badges and court orders made us do it=
!=94?
>
> Is this legal? Can NSA walk in to US based company and legally coerce to
> install such backdoor? If not, what is the incentive for private company =
to
> cooperate?
>

As you might have seen from the beginning of time, people in power assume
anything can go until proven otherwise.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post