[167797] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: turning on comcast v6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lee Howard)
Mon Dec 30 10:49:23 2013
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2013 09:15:41 -0500
From: Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>
To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEmG1=phmPYA-vZ+NVXwi=RwwKgzMEo+tG+tMj6BUtadhdB73Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Jamie Bowden <jamie@photon.com>,
North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
Date: Saturday, December 21, 2013 10:55 PM
To: Lee Howard <Lee@asgard.org>
Cc: Jamie Bowden <jamie@photon.com>, Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>,
"ml@kenweb.org" <ml@kenweb.org>, "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
>>
>> So there's an interesting question. You suggest there's a disagreement
>> between enterprise network operators and protocol designers. Who should
>> change?
>>
>> I used to run an enterprise network. It was very different from an ISP
>> network. I didn't say, "You're wrong!" I said, "What's missing?"
>
> default route information via DHCPv6. That's what I'm still waiting for.
Why?
You say, "The protocol suite doesn't meet my needs; I need default gateway
in DHCPv6." So the IETF WG must change for you to deploy IPv6. Why?
Lee
>
> Matt
>
