|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 21:34:00 -0500 (EST) From: "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org> To: William Waites <wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20131228.030051.509727617.wwaites@tardis.ed.ac.uk> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On Sat, 28 Dec 2013, William Waites wrote: > On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 07:23:36 -0500 (EST), "Justin M. Streiner" <streiner@cluebyfour.org> said: > > > You end up combining some of the downsides of a hardware-based > > router with some of the downsides of a server (new attack > > vectors, another device that needs to be backed up, patched, and > > monitored... > > Might be a good idea to back up, patch and monitor your routers > too... Just sayin' Yes, a given. jms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |