[167707] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Lehmann)
Fri Dec 27 09:44:22 2013
From: Brandon Lehmann <brandon@bitradius.com>
To: Raymond Burkholder <ray@oneunified.net>, 'NANOG list' <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 14:29:17 +0000
In-Reply-To: <075801cf030c$c4002b30$4c008190$@oneunified.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I too am curious...=0A=
=0A=
We've used them for a few months as edge devices and most (if not all) *kno=
ck on wood* of the issues we've had have been fixed by RouterOS updates, co=
nfiguration changes (lots of chefs in the kitchen), or were circuit/carrier=
related.=0A=
=0A=
While I would never compare them apples-to-apples to Cisco, Juniper, etc de=
vices... they have, in our experience, proven to be good inexpensive router=
s with a few quirks here and there. =0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
________________________________________=0A=
From: Raymond Burkholder [ray@oneunified.net]=0A=
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2013 9:05 AM=0A=
To: 'NANOG list'=0A=
Subject: RE: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?=0A=
=0A=
>My real world experience with these is that they suck. Plain and simple.=
=0A=
>Don't waste your time.=0A=
=0A=
Would you mind elaborating what you were trying to accomplish and what=0A=
failed?=0A=
=0A=
Thank you.=0A=
=0A=
Ray=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
--=0A=
This message has been scanned for viruses and=0A=
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is=0A=
believed to be clean.=0A=
=0A=
=0A=
