[167704] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Mikrotik Cloud Core Router and BGP real life experiences?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Eduardo Schoedler)
Fri Dec 27 09:10:36 2013
In-Reply-To: <CAFKNVeFwfYWoHS4X2W7TdYsSxpZabBhN=2+EZdmx1h=pRV+XUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 12:10:24 -0200
From: Eduardo Schoedler <listas@esds.com.br>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
People who tested say they don't forward more than 500Mbps per port.
2013/12/27 matt kelly <mjkelly@gmail.com>
> My real world experience with these is that they suck. Plain and simple.
> Don't waste your time.
> On Dec 27, 2013 3:49 AM, "Martin Hotze" <m.hotze@hotze.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > looking at the specs of Mikrotik Cloud Core Routers it seems to be to
> good
> > to be true [1] having so much bang for the bucks. So virtually all
> smaller
> > ISPs would drop their CISCO gear for Mikrotik Routerboards.
> >
> > We are using a handful of Mikrotik boxes, but on a much lower network
> > level (splitting networks; low end router behind ADSL modem, ...). We're
> > happy with them.
> >
> > So I am asking for real life experience and not lab values with Mikrotik
> > Cloud Core Routers and BGP. How good can they handle full tables and a
> > bunch of peering sessions? How good does the box react when adding
> filters
> > (during attacks)? Reloading the table? etc. etc.
> >
> > I am looking for _real_ _life_ values compared to a CISCO NPE-G2. Please
> > tell me/us from your first hand experience.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > greetings, Martin
> >
> > [1] If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Eduardo Schoedler
