[167612] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: turning on comcast v6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Dec 20 16:10:17 2013
To: Matthew Huff <mhuff@ox.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:50:12 -0500."
<653B375D-82F7-4A7F-9739-9F118BF3D7EA@ox.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 16:07:38 -0500
Cc: nanog2 <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1387573658_2579P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 15:50:12 -0500, Matthew Huff said:
> There is a lot of cruft out there in the enterprise
> world that claims IPv6 compatibility, but in the real world doesn't wor=
k
> consistently. Almost all can be made to work, but require custom config=
uration.
The exact same thing has been said about most IPv4 equipment, but I don't=
see anybody yelling to get rid of IPv4 because there's *still* wonky hard=
ware
out there all these decades after adoption.
--==_Exmh_1387573658_2579P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=e79O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1387573658_2579P--
