[1676] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Policy Statement on Address Space Allocations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex.Bligh)
Mon Jan 29 11:50:59 1996
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@unix1.bart.nl>
cc: amb@Xara.NET (Alex.Bligh), Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net, nanog@merit.edu,
cidrd@iepg.org, iab@isi.edu, iesg@isi.edu, iana@isi.edu,
local-ir@ripe.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 29 Jan 1996 16:50:34 +0100."
<199601291550.QAA18360@unix1.bart.nl>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 1996 16:42:34 +0000
From: "Alex.Bligh" <amb@Xara.NET>
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@unix1.bart.nl> wrote:
> No they don't. You can ask the RIPE NCC for special PI space to assign to
> this customer. It seems they have a "chemical waste dump" to satisfy
> this kind of requests from.
Ah. That will be the "chemical waste dump" that Daniel K said
he didn't care about whether it got routed or not (no offence
Daniel - neither do I), and is all but unaggregatable so presumably
Sprintlink et al. won't want to waste their CPUs routing it as well.
What hope for a customer with those IP numbers?
Alex Bligh
Xara Networks
