[167564] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ddos attacks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tore Anderson)
Thu Dec 19 03:53:40 2013
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:53:13 +0100
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
To: James Braunegg <james.braunegg@micron21.com>,
Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>,
"Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <CA7E867D448D8B489EFF2E97E266038A1DE088F5@RA-EX01.raprinting.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
* James Braunegg
> Of course for any form of Anti DDoS hardware to be functional you
> need to make sure your network can route and pass the traffic so you
> can absorb the bad traffic to give you a chance cleaning the
> traffic.
So in order for an Anti-DDoS appliance to be functional the network
needs to be able to withstand the DDoS on its own. How terribly useful.
Tore