[167555] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ddos attacks
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Wed Dec 18 19:57:48 2013
To: "cb.list6" <cb.list6@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:12:28 -0800."
<CAD6AjGSbQZchc5mNi8gawrhd15YVFJVu87ABM_FpM-RN9iA4aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:56:25 -0500
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1387414584_2269P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:12:28 -0800, =22cb.list6=22 said:
> I am strongly considering having my upstreams to simply rate limit ipv4=
> UDP. It is the simplest solution that is proactive.
What are the prospects for ipv6 UDP not suffering the same fate?
--==_Exmh_1387414584_2269P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001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=bU0z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1387414584_2269P--
