[167451] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: turning on comcast v6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Livingood, Jason)
Wed Dec 11 19:42:11 2013
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 00:42:04 +0000
In-Reply-To: <91CEA684-5EFA-46CC-93F8-818EB3AF20FE@puck.nether.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 12/11/13, 2:32 PM, "Jared Mauch" <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
>I'll chime in with a link to data:
>
>http://www.google.com/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=3Dper-country-ipv6-adoption
>
>Looking at things, USA is at 5%+ adoption, which is due to the hard work
>of folks at Comcast (and other ISPs).
>
>Overall google is seeing 2.5%+ of traffic over native IPv6. in several
>cases IPv6 is actually faster than IPv4:
Anyone else have a good base of comparative performance data with large
data sets / lots of end points?
- Jason
>
>16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=3D0 hlim=3D57 time=3D18.649 ms
>16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=3D1 hlim=3D57 time=3D19.008 ms
>16 bytes from 2001:418:3f4::5, icmp_seq=3D2 hlim=3D57 time=3D18.959 ms
>^C
>--- puck.nether.net ping6 statistics ---
>4 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 25.0% packet loss
>round-trip min/avg/max/std-dev =3D 18.649/18.872/19.008/0.159 ms
>
>PING puck.nether.net (204.42.254.5): 56 data bytes
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D55 time=3D32.920 ms
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D55 time=3D18.467 ms
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D55 time=3D22.014 ms
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=3D3 ttl=3D55 time=3D20.807 ms
>64 bytes from 204.42.254.5: icmp_seq=3D4 ttl=3D55 time=3D19.096 ms
>^C
>--- puck.nether.net ping statistics ---
>5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
>round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 18.467/22.661/32.920/5.280 ms
>
>- jared
