[167387] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [nznog] Web Servers: Dual-homing or DNAT/Port Forwarding?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geraint Jones)
Tue Dec 10 20:05:55 2013

Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 14:05:30 +1300
From: Geraint Jones <geraint@koding.com>
To: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon@cox.net>,
	<nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <52A7B60B.7070809@cox.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


On 11/12/13 1:47 pm, "Larry Sheldon" <LarrySheldon@cox.net> wrote:


>On 12/10/2013 4:30 PM, Geraint Jones wrote:
>
>>>> Number 1 gets you thinking along the IPv6 route (no pun, and imho :) )
>>>> since you have to treat each boxes as if it was public.
>>>
>>> I see this kind of statement surprisingly often. Having a public
>>>address
>>> doesn't make a device public.
>>
>> Yes it does,
>
>Glad to hear that. We (the family, 8 of us, and the 4 dogs will be
>arriving at your house, with its public address, in time for your
>Christmas dinner and we will be staying at least through your New Years
>eve party--maybe longer depending on the weather here.

I think your dogs may struggle with NZ customs.

>
>-- 
>Requiescas in pace o email           Two identifying characteristics
>                                         of System Administrators:
>Ex turpi causa non oritur actio      Infallibility, and the ability to
>                                         learn from their mistakes.
>                                           (Adapted from Stephen Pinker)
>




home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post