[167186] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Tue Dec 3 16:42:42 2013
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <529D9492.8020205@inblock.ru>
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 13:41:01 -0800
To: Nikolay Shopik <shopik@inblock.ru>
Cc: NANOG List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Dec 3, 2013, at 00:21 , Nikolay Shopik <shopik@inblock.ru> wrote:
> On 03/12/13 02:54, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I have talked to my bean counters. We give out /48s to anyone who =
wants them and we don't charge for IPv6 address space.
>=20
> There is some ISP who afraid their users will be reselling their
> connectivity to other users around. While I didin't see that in years
> (probably last time in 2005) but still this exist in poor regions.
I gotta say that, personally, I think worrying about this is kind of =
silly. First, end-user connections don't have enough bandwidth to make =
sharing particularly appealing, especially in poor regions. Second, =
where it does happen, the ISP isn't really losing anything and it's not =
like they have some entitlement to the user not doing so. Third, =
addressing really isn't the hurdle that will stop this.
>=20
> Other than that, completely agree on /56y default and /48 on request,
> but most ISPs here are give-out just single /64.
Ugh.
Owen
