[167165] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Mon Dec 2 21:27:37 2013
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:27:23 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com>
In-Reply-To: <20131202174155.B5BE600D@m0005299.ppops.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
>
> I actually tend to doubt it. All of the people I've talked to from the major
> operators have said that the charges in IPv4 were not a revenue source, they
> were an effort to discourage the consumption of the addresses and/or the use
> of static addresses and to try and recover the costs of dealing with them in
> cases where customers were willing to pay.
> ------------------------------------------
> Not jumping into the turd chunkin' contest, but this is not my experience.
> The suits definitely want the money for income stream; small as it may be.
> I'd like to hear from others if their experiences are different.
oss ops cost reduction
randy
