[167132] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jean-Francois.TremblayING@videotro)
Mon Dec 2 10:27:02 2013
In-Reply-To: <86li07ukk3.fsf@valhalla.seastrom.com>
To: rs@seastrom.com
From: Jean-Francois.TremblayING@videotron.com
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 10:26:43 -0500
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> De : Rob Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com>
> > This space wouldn't be used much anyway,
> > given that most 6RD routers use only one /64, sometimes two.
> > I argue that a /60 is actually the best compromise here, from
> > a space and usage point of view.
>
> IPv4-thinking. In the fullness of time this line of reasoning [...]
Hopefully, the fullness of time won't apply to 6RD (this is what
was being discussed here, not dual-stack).
Most MSOs are planning /56s for native. ARIN 2011-3 is great, but
it came a bit late (January 2012) for those who already had planned
their network.
/JF
