[167098] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Europe-to-US congestion and packet loss on he.net network, and
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Petach)
Sun Dec 1 02:20:26 2013
In-Reply-To: <5299941F.7050507@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 23:19:49 -0800
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
To: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Constantine A. Murenin <mureninc@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Dear NANOG@,
>
...
> From hetzner.de through he.net:
>
>
> Cns# date ; mtr --report{,-wide,-cycles=600} --interval 0.1 --order "SRL
> BGAWV" -4 ????c????????.indiana.edu ; date
>
Using a 1/10th of a second interval is rather anti-social.
I know we rate-limit ICMP traffic down, and such a
short interval would be detected as attack traffic,
and treated as such.
I would take any results you get from such probes
with a grain of salt. What results do you get with
a more sane interval, one of at least 1 second or
more?
Matt
