[166975] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew D Kirch)
Sat Nov 23 12:50:53 2013
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:49:33 -0500
From: Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
To: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPKkNb4a4CX4kmhn0H_9BH=Lw6p4-GquYiTo4Hbr1mrtVM1Enw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I'm going to answer two posts here. First you're correct this appears to
be a 6rd, and it is a /60
IPv6
Status Available
Global Unicast IPv6 Address 2602:306:cddd:1c50::/60
Border Relay IPv4 Address 12.83.49.81
On 11/23/2013 1:58 AM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
> On 22 November 2013 22:22, Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> wrote:
>> Status Available
>> Global IPv6 Address 2602:306:cddd:xxxx::1/64
>> Link-local IPv6 Address fe80::923e:abff:xxxx:7e40
>> Router Advertisement Prefix 2602:306:cddd:xxxx::/64
>> IPV6 Delegated LAN Prefix 2602:306:cddd:xxxx::
>> 2602:306:cddd:xxxx::
> I don't believe this is native IPv6; it's probably still their 6rd,
> which has, in fact, been live since at least February 2012, i.e. for
> close to two years at this point.
>
> http://tu.cnst.su/post/16958139578/at-t-u-verse-6rd-in-santa-clara-county
> http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/index.php?topic=2293.0
>
> And, yes, AT&T is probably still keeping this whole thing a secret.
>
> C.
