[166970] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T UVERSE Native IPv6, a HOWTO
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Constantine A. Murenin)
Sat Nov 23 02:01:06 2013
In-Reply-To: <5290498A.6040405@trelane.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 22:58:59 -0800
From: "Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@gmail.com>
To: Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 22 November 2013 22:22, Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> wrote:
> Status Available
> Global IPv6 Address 2602:306:cddd:xxxx::1/64
> Link-local IPv6 Address fe80::923e:abff:xxxx:7e40
> Router Advertisement Prefix 2602:306:cddd:xxxx::/64
> IPV6 Delegated LAN Prefix 2602:306:cddd:xxxx::
> 2602:306:cddd:xxxx::
I don't believe this is native IPv6; it's probably still their 6rd,
which has, in fact, been live since at least February 2012, i.e. for
close to two years at this point.
http://tu.cnst.su/post/16958139578/at-t-u-verse-6rd-in-santa-clara-county
http://www.tunnelbroker.net/forums/index.php?topic=2293.0
And, yes, AT&T is probably still keeping this whole thing a secret.
C.
