|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> In-Reply-To: <002b01cee7c9$d46bcb40$7d4361c0$@tndh.net> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:48:17 -0800 To: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net> Cc: NANOG List <nanog@nanog.org> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org So one has to wonder how those names made it into the top 100 list if = it=92s supposed to be a top 100 web sites, since they are obviously not = web sites. (at least in the case of the two in the top 100) Owen On Nov 22, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net> wrote: > The only thing it explicitly strips out are dotted-quads, which don't = occur > until # 4255. The code makes five passes at getaddrinfo() for IPv4 = before > giving up, and then it checks for a leading www and if that exists it = strips > it off and does the 5 tries loop again, then later the same process = for > IPv6. For the top 100 run: > akamaihd.net no IPv4 no IPv6 > bp.blogspot.com no IPv4 no IPv6 >=20 > FWIW ::: > Dotted-quad's in the top 10,000 > 4255,92.242.195.24 > 4665,1.1.1.1 > 5079,92.242.195.231 > 6130,1.254.254.254 > 9518,208.98.30.70 >=20 >> whois 92.242.195.24 > ... > netname: Respina > descr: BroadBand IP Pool > country: IR > ... > route: 92.242.195.0/24 >=20 > Respina BroadBand IP Pool in the top 100,000 > 4255,92.242.195.24 > 5079,92.242.195.231 > 10059,92.242.195.233 > 23912,92.242.195.30 > 31520,92.242.195.111 > 35867,92.242.195.235 > 95233,92.242.195.129 >=20 >=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen@delong.com] >> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 12:16 PM >> To: joel jaeggli >> Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu; Tony Hain; NANOG List >> Subject: Re: NAT64 and matching identities >>=20 >> It would be way more than 2 if it were CNAME, methinks. >>=20 >> Owen >>=20 >> On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:12 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote: >>=20 >>> On 11/22/13, 12:01 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: >>>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:18:27 -0800, "Tony Hain" said: >>>>=20 >>>>> The top 100 websites: AAAA records and IPv6 connectivity >>>>> count with A: 98 ( 98.000%) >>>>> count with AAAA: 30 ( 30.000%) >>>>> Of the 30 hosts with AAAA records, testing connectivity to TCP/80: >>>>> count with IPv6 ok: 30 (100.000%) >>>>=20 >>>> Statistics whoopsie, or are there actually 2 sites in the top100 = that >>>> are IPv6-only? >>>=20 >>> IN CNAME ? or is that being accounted for. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |