[166961] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAT64 and matching identities
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Nov 22 15:20:46 2013
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <528FBABA.2050401@bogus.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:16:11 -0800
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Cc: NANOG List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
It would be way more than 2 if it were CNAME, methinks.
Owen
On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:12 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
> On 11/22/13, 12:01 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:18:27 -0800, "Tony Hain" said:
>>
>>> The top 100 websites: AAAA records and IPv6 connectivity
>>> count with A: 98 ( 98.000%)
>>> count with AAAA: 30 ( 30.000%)
>>> Of the 30 hosts with AAAA records, testing connectivity to TCP/80:
>>> count with IPv6 ok: 30 (100.000%)
>>
>> Statistics whoopsie, or are there actually 2 sites in the top100
>> that are IPv6-only?
>
> IN CNAME ? or is that being accounted for.
>
>
>