[166961] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: NAT64 and matching identities

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Nov 22 15:20:46 2013

From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <528FBABA.2050401@bogus.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:16:11 -0800
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Cc: NANOG List <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

It would be way more than 2 if it were CNAME, methinks.

Owen

On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:12 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:

> On 11/22/13, 12:01 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:18:27 -0800, "Tony Hain" said:
>> 
>>> The top 100 websites: AAAA records and IPv6 connectivity
>>>           count with A:       98   ( 98.000%)
>>>        count with AAAA:       30   ( 30.000%)
>>> Of the 30 hosts with AAAA records, testing connectivity to TCP/80:
>>>     count with IPv6 ok:       30   (100.000%)
>> 
>> Statistics whoopsie, or are there actually 2 sites in the top100
>> that are IPv6-only?
> 
> IN CNAME ? or is that being accounted for.
> 
> 
> 



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post